Weave Pass 3 — cross-tradition follow-up to audit v1.9 (2026-06-23)

Run: cross-tradition weave run · branch claude/cross-tradition-weave-2026-06-23 (cut off audit HEAD; audit v1.9 not yet merged to master). Trigger: the audit v1.9 Phase-8 cousin-disposition table (synthetic-layer-2026-06-23.md §cousin-disposition) flagged 4 relation-only cross-tradition cousins for retire-and-relocate; this run executes that, plus the iso-scan of the cross-tradition HUB pairs, plus 2 new-pair scans flagged for future weave (motifs-delta §3.3). Method: 8 read-only structural-isomorphism-scanner invocations (opus 1M, max effort) via Workflow wf_15eb8350-d58, returning structured verdicts; orchestrator (main thread) assembled this report and is the sole writer/committer. Dry-run — nothing applied yet; the §12f hand-apply + the 4 retirements HALT for maintainer confirmation (see §8). Apply path: all 6 cross-tradition cousins returned Latent-Adjacent, so the apply is the §12e carve-out (Open-Questions + *has cross-tradition cousin* typed connections + motifs.md BRIDGE entries — no claims.md candidate emission) via the §12f maintainer hand-apply path (≤3 cards/batch; the 3 RELATION-ONLY cards fit exactly). No Iso-threshold calibration is required for the Latent-Adjacent-restricted path; no formal sign-off run is required.

§1 — Verdict summary (8 scans)

# Pair Tradition axis Verdict Recommended relation Cousin claim Disposition
1 anamnesis ↔ institution Plato ↔ Husserl/MP LATENT-ADJACENT has cross-tradition cousin anamnesis-stiftung-cross-tradition-cousins RELATION-ONLY → Card 1 + retire
2 writing-and-living ↔ pharmakon MP ↔ Plato LATENT-ADJACENT (inversion sub-type) has cross-tradition cousin mp-writing-and-living-inverts-phaedrus RELATION-ONLY → Card 2 + retire
3 allegory-of-the-cave ↔ aletheia Plato ↔ Heidegger LATENT-ADJACENT (attributive/inverting) has cross-tradition cousin republic-cave-aletheia-orthotes RELATION-ONLY → Card 3 + retire
4 khora ↔ flesh-as-element Plato ↔ MP LATENT-ADJACENT has cross-tradition cousin (present) khora-third-kind-mp-third-domain CONTESTABLE-THESIS → stays candidate; §B#1 retype
5 non-being ↔ bestimmte-negation Plato ↔ Hegel LATENT-ADJACENT has cross-tradition cousin sophist-not-being-as-difference-vs-determinate-negation CONTESTABLE-THESIS → stays candidate
6 peras-apeiron ↔ changement-quantite-qualite Plato ↔ Hegel LATENT-ADJACENT has cross-tradition cousin peras-apeiron-hegel-masz CONTESTABLE-THESIS → stays candidate; 8.6 merge-check
7 mimesis ↔ simulacrum Plato ↔ Deleuze/Klossowski PARTIAL (genealogical inversion) inverts (already on pages) n/a (already captured) record-only — §7
8 mimesis ↔ umdrehung-des-platonismus Plato ↔ Nietzsche/Deleuze DISANALOGOUS (false-friend) critiques (already on pages) n/a record-only — §7

Tally: 6 Latent-Adjacent · 1 Partial · 1 Disanalogous. Zero Isomorphic, zero new claims.md candidates — the expected outcome for a cross-tradition run (cross-tradition pairs route to Latent-Adjacent by the v0d.9 signature; the corpus's established low-Iso-yield regime, per weave-calibration-2026-05-16, holds). The 6 Latent-Adjacent verdicts independently confirm the audit's Phase-1 cross-tradition reader and the Phase-8 disposition table.

§2 — Per-pair scan results (condensed; full reasoning in the run output)

Each scanner read both concept pages + cited extraction notes, articulated the rejection-substitute-grounding triple per page, compared on axes (i)/(ii)/(iii), and ran the veto check. Condensed below to the decisive axis + the Latent-Adjacent five-condition signature; the drafted Open-Questions cautions (verbatim, apply-ready) are carried in the bridge cards (§4) and §B/§7.

Scan 1 — anamnesis ↔ institution — LATENT-ADJACENT. Axes (i)+(ii) aligned: both reject acquisition-as-fresh-production and substitute recovery/reactivation of latent un-self-constituted meaning (slave-boy "finds the knowledge within himself"; instituted sense "regained without total recreation"). Axis (iii) not aligned (decisive): atemporal/closed/complete Forms-via-immortal-individual-soul vs historical/intersubjective/open institution-in-time-that-opens-a-future — no shared third register. Signature: all 5 conditions hold; (5) n/a (no auto-identification). Veto: would-duplicate anamnesis-stiftung-cross-tradition-cousins (mooted by Latent-Adjacent emitting no candidate).

Scan 2 — writing-and-living ↔ pharmakon — LATENT-ADJACENT (inversion sub-type). Axis (i) partial (same living/written-deposit distinction, opposite evaluative direction — the inversion signature); axis (ii) aligned (both position "life" relative to the written sign); axis (iii) not aligned: incarnate institution (Bildung/Stiftung) vs transcendent recollection (Forms/anamnesis). Signature: (1)–(4) hold, (5) n/a (no auto-identification — MP nowhere names Plato; reconstructed antipode). A signed (inversion-kind) cross-tradition cousin.

Scan 3 — allegory-of-the-cave ↔ aletheia — LATENT-ADJACENT (attributive/inverting). Axis (i) partial, axis (ii) aligned (both replace an externally-additive picture — knowledge poured into the soul / concealment-as-added-shadow — with a constitutive-internal reorientation: periagōgē / Lethe-als-Herz); axis (iii) not aligned: Platonic two-world metaphysics + paideia-politics vs Heideggerian Es-Geben/Seinsgeschichte/Lichtung. Two load-bearing caveats: (a) the link is attributive — it exists only on Heidegger's own reading ("Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit"), under which the Cave is the genealogical site where unconcealment is subordinated to correctness (the cousin-as-origin/target, not a co-mover); (b) the aletheia page records Heidegger's 1964 self-retraction (GA 14 pp. 87–88) of the Wesenswandel thesis the Cave-reading leans on — so the "Cave as fall-of-truth" gloss is contested by its own author and must not be asserted flatly.

Scan 4 — khora ↔ flesh-as-element — LATENT-ADJACENT. Axes (i)+(ii) aligned (both reject a primitive bipartition and substitute a characterless, obliquely-accessed founding third "midway between the individual and the idea"); axis (iii) not aligned: necessitarian-cosmogonic-theological grounding (Necessity / errant cause / demiurge / bastard reasoning, non-sensible) vs perceptual-carnal-historical grounding (reversibility / facticity / sedimentation, sensible). The two occupy the "third" slot for opposite reasons. Derrida's resists-analogy caution is honored, not overridden — Latent-Adjacent asserts a registral divergence (cousinhood-with-split), consonant with Derrida's thesis that the khôra founds the very oppositions an analogy deploys. Both pages already carry the correct relation (flesh-as-element has cross-tradition cousin khora, l.418; khora contrasts with flesh). Claim khora-third-kind-mp-third-domain stays candidate (CONTESTABLE-THESIS). Feeds §B#1 (the khôra↔matrixed-ontology over-strong retype).

Scan 5 — non-being ↔ bestimmte-negation — LATENT-ADJACENT. Axis (i) aligned (both reject the abstract Nothing; negation must bear intelligibility); axis (ii) partial (same substitute-family, divergent mechanism — heteron is "determinate negation minus its engine": no Aufhebung, no negation-of-the-negation, 257b denies contrariety); axis (iii) not aligned: static koinōnia tōn genōn grounding the sayability of the false vs self-negating-contradiction-as-engine grounding dialectical self-movement. No auto-identification (Hegel distances himself, charging the Parmenides — not the Sophist — with "stopping at the negative"). Claim sophist-not-being-as-difference-vs-determinate-negation stays candidate (carries a corrective thesis beyond the relation).

Scan 6 — peras-apeiron ↔ changement-quantite-qualite — LATENT-ADJACENT. Axes (i)+(ii) aligned (both reject a degree-continuum that admits only of "more"; both substitute quantity-becomes-quality at a determination-point); axis (iii) not aligned: ethics-as-applied-ontology + cosmic aitia (limit-from-above, static, no nodal leap) vs philosophy-of-history + institutional causation (degeneration-without-rupture). Auto-identification is naming-level only (the MP page invokes Hegel's Umschlagen but imports the name into a political-historical apparatus, not the immanent self-movement; the page's own Open Question concedes the source is contested). Claim peras-apeiron-hegel-masz stays candidate; routed to Phase-8.6 merge-check vs collection-and-division↔bestimmte-negation.

Scan 7 — mimesis ↔ simulacrum — PARTIAL (genealogical inversion). Axis (i) not aligned (decisive): the simulacrum's rejection-target IS mimesis's substitute (the graded model→copy→phantasma fidelity hierarchy) — one constructs what the other overturns. Fails Latent-Adjacent condition (1). The genuine relation is inverts/genealogy (Deleuze's "overturning of Platonism"), already encoded on both pages (inverts/subordinates/contrasts with) and already captured by [[claims#simulacrum-as-being-not-copy]] (candidate) + [[claims#circulus-vitiosus-two-receptions]] (candidate). No new claim (would duplicate). Record-only — §7.

Scan 8 — mimesis ↔ umdrehung-des-platonismus — DISANALOGOUS (false-friend). Axes (i)+(ii) both inverted: mimesis installs the two-world model/copy hierarchy; the Umdrehung/Herausdrehung abolishes it. The seductive "both refuse a naive copy/swap" reading is the false friend (mimesis's non-duplication preserves the model-copy gap; the Herausdrehung dissolves it). Relation is critiques/is targeted by, already on both pages. No claim homes both. Record-only so future weave runs do not re-test — §7.

Lead triage ledger

(§3)

Lead ID Triage bucket Target artifact Override Rationale
bridge-card:anamnesis-institution-cross-tradition-cousin typed-connection Bridge Card 1 — Latent-Adjacent cross-tradition cousin; §12e/§12f relocation of relation-only cousin anamnesis-stiftung-cross-tradition-cousins. Concept-page relation + BRIDGE only.
bridge-card:writing-living-pharmakon-cross-tradition-cousin typed-connection Bridge Card 2 — Latent-Adjacent (inversion sub-type) relocation of relation-only cousin mp-writing-and-living-inverts-phaedrus. Canonicalizes ad-hoc *inverts* → closed-list *has cross-tradition cousin* (inversion kept in prose).
bridge-card:cave-aletheia-cross-tradition-cousin typed-connection Bridge Card 3 — Latent-Adjacent (attributive/inverting) relocation of relation-only cousin republic-cave-aletheia-orthotes. Canonicalizes ad-hoc *is the site of…* → *has cross-tradition cousin*; carries the Heidegger-1964 retraction caveat.
retype:khora-matrixed-ontology typed-connection §B#1 — §B register-over-strong fix: *shares mechanism with* → *has cross-tradition cousin* (cross-tradition; cousin khora-third-kind-mp-third-domain stays candidate). Not a card (no relation-only retirement).
retype:peras-apeiron-khora typed-connection §B#2 — §B register-over-strong fix: *shares mechanism with* → *contrasts with* (intra-Plato; accompanies retirement of relation-only cousin peras-apeiron-khora-cousins). Not a BRIDGE (routed out, same-author).
new-pair:mimesis-simulacrum open-question §7 record-only — Genealogical inversion already captured by existing claims + typed connections; no new write required.
new-pair:mimesis-umdrehung false-friend §7 record-only — Disanalogous false-friend; relation already on pages as critiques; recorded so future weave runs do not re-test.

(Validator note: only typed-connection leads enter bridge-card sign-off without an override; the 3 cards qualify. The two retype: leads are not bridge cards — handled as direct §B typed-connection corrections. The two new-pair: leads are record-only.)

§4 — Bridge cards (Status: proposed — §12f hand-apply candidates)

All three are Bridge type: latent-adjacent, restricted to the §12e carve-out (Open-Questions writes + *has cross-tradition cousin* typed connections + motifs.md BRIDGE entries; no claims.md candidate emission). The §12f per-card gate trace is in §5.

Bridge Card 1 of 3: anamnesis-institution-cross-tradition-cousin

  • Status: proposed

  • Bridge type: latent-adjacent

  • Confidence: low

  • Primary home: anamnesis

  • Secondary homes: institution, sedimentation

  • Relation:

    • anamnesis → institution / sedimentation — has cross-tradition cousin (already present on anamnesis.md l.47; the Meno-problem axis: acquisition presupposes prior possession, under registrally divergent grounding)

  • Evidence anchors: plato-meno 82e–86b, 97e–98a (aitias logismos) [extraction-note .extraction-plato-meno.md]; plato-phaedo 72e–77a [extraction-note .extraction-plato-phaedo.md]; MP side via motifs.md §"Stiftung / institution (Husserl ↔ MP)" + institution/sedimentation (parole parlée/reactivation).

  • Evidence status: extraction-note anchored (Plato side) + source-page/motif anchored (MP side).

  • What it makes visible: the Meno problem as the shared problem-space both traditions inhabit — MP's anti-empiricist account of learning read as a temporalization of a structure Plato first posed and answered atemporally; invisible from either the Plato pages or the institution pages alone.

  • Counterpressure: grounding diverges totally (atemporal/closed/complete deposit via immortal individual soul vs historical/intersubjective/open institution-in-time); a skeptic may hold "cousin" overstates a shared problem into a shared answer. The finer, more defensible micro-parallel (aitias logismos "tying down" ↔ sedimentation-as-stabilization) is not yet passage-anchored on the MP side.

    • counter-test: pair the MP Institution and Passivity reactivation passages against Meno 97e–98a at the passage level; if no structural parallel survives there, downgrade the relation to contrasts with.

  • Apply as:

    1. anamnesis.md — keep the existing *has cross-tradition cousin* [[institution]] / [[sedimentation]] Connections bullet (l.47); add a ## Open Questions Latent-Adjacent caution (verbatim below); update its [[claims#anamnesis-stiftung-cross-tradition-cousins]] (candidate) references (Connections l.47 + ## Motif Weight l.60) to (retired — relation now carried as this typed connection + motifs.md BRIDGE; see weave-pass3-2026-06-23).
    2. institution.md — add one reciprocal *has cross-tradition cousin* [[anamnesis]] Connections bullet (matching the established Gadamer-cousin pattern at l.284).
    3. sedimentation.md — add one reciprocal *has cross-tradition cousin* [[anamnesis]] Connections bullet.
    4. motifs.md — BRIDGE entry "anamnesis (Plato) ↔ Stiftung/sedimentation" present (Phase 3); confirm its claim-ref reads (retired) post-apply.
    5. Retire claim anamnesis-stiftung-cross-tradition-cousins (§8).

    Open-Questions caution (verbatim): Latent-Adjacent cross-tradition cousin of institution / sedimentation on the Meno-problem axis (weave Pass 3, 2026-06-23 / v0d.9): axes (i)+(ii) align across the tradition boundary — both reject acquisition-as-fresh-production and substitute recovery/reactivation of latent, un-self-constituted meaning — but axis (iii) grounding diverges registrally: Plato's latency is of eternal, atemporal, closed Forms recovered via an immortal individual soul (recovery re-presents a finished past), whereas Stiftung/institution is historical, intersubjective, open — meaning founded in time and reactivated within a tradition, opening a future. The grounding-register split is constitutive of the parallel, not a weakness of it; it licenses the typed *has cross-tradition cousin* connection, not a claims.md thesis. The finer, more defensible micro-parallel remains aitias logismos ("tying down," Meno 97e–98a) ↔ sedimentation-as-stabilization. See wiki/.audit/weave-pass3-2026-06-23.md.

Bridge Card 2 of 3: writing-living-pharmakon-cross-tradition-cousin

  • Status: proposed

  • Bridge type: latent-adjacent

  • Confidence: low

  • Primary home: writing-and-living

  • Secondary homes: pharmakon, sedimentation

  • Relation:

    • writing-and-living → pharmakon — has cross-tradition cousin (inversion sub-type: same living/written-deposit distinction, opposite evaluation; "inversion" kept in the bullet prose)

  • Evidence anchors: plato-phaedrus 274e–276a (Theuth–Thamus; the "orphaned" written word; living speech "written in the soul") [extraction-note .extraction-plato-phaedrus.md]; merleau-ponty-2026-literary-use-language L8 [87]/[89] (quadruple-negation; writing as Bildung) + sedimentation (reactivatable deposit).

  • Evidence status: extraction-note anchored (Plato side) + source-page anchored (MP side).

  • What it makes visible: the Phaedrus as the classical pole of a three-way constellation (Plato's hierarchy / Derrida's deconstruction / MP's inversion); MP relocates the "life" Plato reserves for speech-in-the-soul into the written/sedimented deposit.

  • Counterpressure: "inversion" may overclaim — MP nowhere cites Plato (the writing-and-living page does not name the Phaedrus), so the relation may be a reconstructed antipode reached independently, not a deliberate overturning; Derrida's pharmakon-undecidability further destabilizes a clean inversion (the Phaedrus may already deconstruct its own hierarchy).

    • counter-test: check MP's 1953 literature course for any direct engagement with the Phaedrus/Plato; if none, the relation stays a reconstructed cousinhood (not MP's own overturning) and must not be glossed as intentional inversion.

  • Apply as:

    1. writing-and-living.md — canonicalize the existing *inverts* [[pharmakon]] bullet (l.67) to *has cross-tradition cousin* [[pharmakon]] (closed-list type), keeping "inverts/inversion: same vocabulary pair, opposite evaluation" in the bullet prose; add the ## Open Questions Latent-Adjacent caution (verbatim below); update the [[claims#mp-writing-and-living-inverts-phaedrus]] (candidate) ref → (retired — relocated to this typed connection + motifs.md BRIDGE).
    2. pharmakon.md — canonicalize *contrasts with* [[writing-and-living]] (l.43) to *has cross-tradition cousin* [[writing-and-living]] (or keep contrasts with + add the cousin bullet); update the [[claims#mp-writing-and-living-inverts-phaedrus]] (candidate) prose ref (l.39) → (retired).
    3. motifs.md — BRIDGE entry "Phaedrus pharmakon ↔ MP writing" present (Phase 3); confirm claim-ref reads (retired).
    4. Retire claim mp-writing-and-living-inverts-phaedrus (§8).

    Open-Questions caution (verbatim): Latent-Adjacent cross-tradition cousin of pharmakon / the Phaedrus*'s writing-critique (weave Pass 3, 2026-06-23 / v0d.9), inversion sub-type: axes (i)+(ii) align in family/form — both turn on the same living/written-deposit distinction and both position "life" relative to the written sign — but place "life" on opposite sides (Plato withholds it from the deposit; MP relocates it into the deposit as Bildung), and axis (iii) grounding diverges registrally (incarnate institution / Stiftung vs transcendent recollection / the Forms). There is no auto-identification — MP nowhere names Plato — so the inversion is a* reconstructed antipode, not MP's own overturning of a text he engages; Derrida's Plato's Pharmacy further complicates a clean inversion. Carried as a *has cross-tradition cousin* typed connection, below claim-grade by design. See wiki/.audit/weave-pass3-2026-06-23.md.

Bridge Card 3 of 3: cave-aletheia-cross-tradition-cousin

  • Status: proposed

  • Bridge type: latent-adjacent

  • Confidence: low

  • Primary home: allegory-of-the-cave

  • Secondary homes: aletheia, form-of-the-good

  • Relation:

    • allegory-of-the-cave → aletheia — has cross-tradition cousin (attributive/inverting: on Heidegger's reading the Cave is the genealogical site where unconcealment is subordinated to correctness; carries the 1964-retraction caveat in prose)

  • Evidence anchors: plato-republic 514a–518d (Cave + periagōgē), 508e (the Good "gives truth"), 515d ("sees more correctly") [extraction-note .extraction-plato-republic.md]; aletheia §"The 1964 Self-Correction" (GA 14 pp. 86–88) — Heidegger's Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit + his Wesenswandel retraction.

  • Evidence status: extraction-note anchored (Plato side) + source-page anchored (Heidegger side, via the aletheia page).

  • What it makes visible: why the Cave (not the Line or Sun) is the recurrent target of the "Plato begins metaphysics" thesis — the image where looking-correctly (orthotēs) displaces coming-out-of-hiddenness (alētheia).

  • Counterpressure: the connection is attributive — it exists only on Heidegger's reading, not as a neutral reading of Plato; and the aletheia page records Heidegger's own 1964 self-retraction of the Wesenswandel thesis (no essential change of truth from Greek unconcealment to Roman adaequatio; alētheia als solche "never thought as such"). So the "Cave as fall-of-truth" gloss is contested by its own author and must not be asserted flatly. The textual hooks (515d, 508e) may show correctness added alongside unconcealment, not subordinating it.

    • counter-test: read 515d/508e/518d against the late-Heidegger 1964 position; if the orthotēs-subordination requires the retracted Wesenswandel thesis, the relation must stay descriptive (no "fall of truth" assertion in any page's own voice).

  • Apply as:

    1. allegory-of-the-cave.md — add a *has cross-tradition cousin* [[aletheia]] Connections bullet (the closed-list canonical type; keep the existing descriptive *is the site of the* alētheia → orthotēs *transition in* [[aletheia]] bullet at l.43 as the attributive gloss); add the ## Open Questions Latent-Adjacent caution (verbatim below) with the 1964-retraction caveat; update the [[claims#republic-cave-aletheia-orthotes]] (candidate) refs (l.37, l.43) → (retired — relocated to this typed connection + motifs.md BRIDGE, with the Heidegger-1964 retraction caveat).
    2. aletheia.md — keep the existing *is, on Heidegger's reading, subordinated to correctness in* [[allegory-of-the-cave]] bullet (l.132) as the attributive gloss; update its claim-ref → (retired); the §"1964 Self-Correction" already supplies the caveat.
    3. form-of-the-good.md — update the [[claims#republic-cave-aletheia-orthotes]] (candidate) ref (l.44) → (retired).
    4. motifs.md — BRIDGE entry "Cave/the Good ↔ aletheia/unconcealment" present (Phase 3, with the 1964-retraction cross-reference); confirm claim-ref reads (retired).
    5. Retire claim republic-cave-aletheia-orthotes (§8).

    Open-Questions caution (verbatim): Latent-Adjacent cross-tradition cousin of aletheia (weave Pass 3, 2026-06-23 / v0d.9), attributive/inverting: axes (i)+(ii) align in family/form across the Plato↔Heidegger boundary — both replace an externally-additive picture (knowledge poured into the soul; concealment as shadow added to light) with a constitutive-internal reorientation (periagōgē; Lethe als das Herz) — but axis (iii) grounding diverges registrally (Platonic two-world metaphysics + paideia-politics vs Heideggerian Es-Geben / Seinsgeschichte / Lichtung). Two caveats are load-bearing: (a) the link is attributive — it holds only on Heidegger's own reading ("Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit"), under which the Cave is the cousin-as-origin/target where unconcealment is subordinated to correctness, not a structural co-mover; (b) the aletheia page records Heidegger's 1964 self-retraction of the Wesenswandel thesis (GA 14 pp. 87–88), so the "Cave as fall-of-truth" gloss is contested by its own author and must not be asserted in any page's own voice. Carried as a *has cross-tradition cousin* typed connection, below claim-grade by design. See wiki/.audit/weave-pass3-2026-06-23.md.

§5 — §12f per-card gate trace (the §3 7-test schema gate, maintainer-adjudicated)

Recorded per §12f condition 2. All three cards are latent-adjacent, batch size 3 (= cap), no formal-run override of any (none of these pairs was BLOCKED/RETIRED/narrowed by a prior formal run).

Test Card 1 (anamnesis↔institution) Card 2 (writing-living↔pharmakon) Card 3 (cave↔aletheia)
1 Anchor traceability PASS — Meno/Phaedo extraction-anchored; MP via motifs/source pages PASS — Phaedrus extraction + MP source page PASS — Republic extraction + aletheia source page (GA 14)
2 Counter-test specificity PASS — passage-level aitias-logismos↔sedimentation check PASS — check MP 1953 course for direct Plato engagement PASS — read 515d/508e/518d against the 1964 position
3 Apply-as specificity PASS — page/section/relation/anchors named PASS PASS
4 Single-source blocker (presence+adequacy) PASS — Latent-Adjacent emits no claim; carve-out caps reach at Open-Q + typed-conn + BRIDGE; no multi-target enacts PASS PASS
5 Primary-home selection justified PASS — Plato-side page is primary (the relocated relation's home) PASS — writing-and-living (the MP page carrying the relation) PASS — allegory-of-the-cave (the Plato page)
6 Counterpressure present+specific PASS — names the total grounding divergence + unanchored micro-parallel PASS — reconstructed-antipode + Derrida PASS — attributive + 1964 retraction
7 Apply-as wikilinks resolve PASS — anamnesis/institution/sedimentation/plato-meno/plato-phaedo exist PASS — writing-and-living/pharmakon/sedimentation/plato-phaedrus exist PASS — allegory-of-the-cave/aletheia/form-of-the-good/plato-republic exist

All 3 cards: 7/7 PASS. §12e carve-out respected (Apply-as items write only Open-Questions, *has cross-tradition cousin* typed connections, and motifs.md BRIDGE entries — no What-the-Concept-Does/Stakes, no claims.md candidate). Maintainer adjudication pending at the §8 halt.

§B — Register-over-strong typed-connection retypes (from coherence §B; not bridge cards)

Two existing typed connections assert *shares mechanism with* where the cited claim only supports a cousin-under-suspicion. These are typed-connection corrections (not relation-only-cousin relocations), handled as direct edits:

  1. khora → matrixed-ontology (khora.md l.49; plato-timaeus.md l.111): *shares mechanism with* crosses the tradition boundary (Plato→MP/Kaushik reception) on a speculative-confidence, Derrida-quarantined claim — the single most over-strong link in the cohort, and internally inconsistent on khora.md (flesh gets *contrasts with*, matrixed-ontology gets the stronger verb). Scan 4 confirms khôra's cross-tradition relations are cousinhood-under-registral-divergence, not shared mechanism. → Retype to *has cross-tradition cousin* (§12e-authorized; cross-tradition Latent-Adjacent). Claim khora-third-kind-mp-third-domain stays candidate; keep its (candidate) ref.
  2. peras-apeiron → khora (peras-apeiron.md l.48; plato-philebus.md l.115): *shares mechanism with* for an intra-Plato same-author pair is registrally permissible but stronger than the peras-apeiron-khora-cousins candidate warrants (its own counterpressure invokes Derrida "a fortiori"). Routed out of BRIDGE (same-author). → Downgrade to *contrasts with* as part of retiring relation-only cousin peras-apeiron-khora-cousins (§8). Update the (candidate) ref → (retired).

§7 — New-pair findings (record-only; no write required)

  1. mimesis ↔ simulacrum — PARTIAL (genealogical inversion). Not a cross-tradition cousin: the simulacrum's rejection-target is mimesis's substitute (the fidelity hierarchy), so axis (i) is inverted, not aligned — fails Latent-Adjacent condition (1). The genuine relation (inverts / Deleuze's "overturning of Platonism") is already encoded on both pages and already captured by [[claims#simulacrum-as-being-not-copy]] (candidate) + [[claims#circulus-vitiosus-two-receptions]] (candidate). No new claim, no new typed connection. (Optional, deferred: a one-line ## Open Questions note on mimesis cross-linking the inversion — left to a future reciprocity pass; not applied here to keep the run minimal.)
  2. mimesis ↔ umdrehung-des-platonismus — DISANALOGOUS (false-friend). Both axes (i)+(ii) inverted (mimesis installs the two-world hierarchy; the Umdrehung abolishes it). The relation (critiques / is targeted by) is already on both pages (allegory-of-the-cave/mimesis ↔ umdrehung). Recorded here so future weave runs do not re-test this pair as a latent isomorphism. No write.

Also deferred (no Plato-side page): flux/heracliteanism ↔ durée (Bergson) — motifs-delta §1 #9 held flux at THEME with no standalone Plato concept page (heracliteanism/flux-doctrine/being-becoming are all missing). The scan would return Indeterminate. Deferred until a Plato flux/heracliteanism page exists.

§8 — Retire-and-relocate queue — HALT for maintainer confirmation

Per the v1.9 Phase-8 disposition + bridge-card-signoff §12e (a Latent-Adjacent cross-tradition cousin relation is below claim-grade by design), the 4 RELATION-ONLY cousins are retired from claims.md and their relations relocated to typed connections + motifs.md BRIDGE entries. Retirement HALTS for user confirmation (retirement ≠ deletion; entries preserved with reasoning, no Supersedes: since the successor is a typed connection, not a claim).

# Claim to retire Relocation target Status after
1 anamnesis-stiftung-cross-tradition-cousins (candidate) Card 1 → has cross-tradition cousin (anamnesis↔institution/sedimentation) + BRIDGE + Open-Q caution retired
2 mp-writing-and-living-inverts-phaedrus (candidate) Card 2 → has cross-tradition cousin (writing-and-living↔pharmakon) + BRIDGE + Open-Q caution retired
3 peras-apeiron-khora-cousins (candidate) §B#2 → contrasts with (peras-apeiron↔khora, intra-Plato; no BRIDGE) retired
4 republic-cave-aletheia-orthotes (candidate) Card 3 → has cross-tradition cousin (cave↔aletheia) + BRIDGE + Open-Q caution (1964-retraction caveat) retired

The 3 CONTESTABLE-THESIS cousins stay candidate, untouched (sophist-not-being-as-difference-vs-determinate-negation, khora-third-kind-mp-third-domain, peras-apeiron-hegel-masz) — each carries a thesis beyond the bare relation. (khora-third-kind gets only the §B#1 typed-connection retype; peras-apeiron-hegel-masz remains routed to the Phase-8.6 merge-check.)

§9 — Apply plan & routing (post-confirmation)

On maintainer confirmation of the §8 retirements:

  1. §12f hand-apply Cards 1–3 — the Apply-as items in §4 (Open-Q cautions, typed-connection canonicalizations, reciprocals). Add <!-- bridge-card: <slug> --> + frontmatter bridge_cards: [<slug>] to each destination page; one bridge-cards-applied.md row per card (Sign-off run: hand-apply, maintainer-adjudicated (§12f) + pointer to this report's §5 gate trace).
  2. §B retypes — khora↔matrixed-ontology (→ cross-tradition cousin) + peras-apeiron↔khora (→ contrasts with).
  3. Retire the 4 claims in claims.md (Status: retired + Status-History reasoning); update concept-page (candidate) claim-refs → (retired).
  4. Provenance/build: check_bridge_card_provenance (lint); normalize_claims_table.py --write (claims Summary table + index Claims section + count: candidate −4, retired +4, total 280 unchanged); normalize_index_tables.py --write if page frontmatter changed (bridge_cards fields); refresh_baselines.py (Rule 19).
  5. Reports/log: weave-survey-2026-06-23.md Pass-5 summary; log.md weave entry; overview.md if stats changed.
  6. Single commit weave: 2026-06-23 (revertibility).

Not in scope (audit lineage, separate branch): Step 8.9 cite-back for the 22 promoted claims (33 files); the ~50 silent-key subsections + reciprocity fixes; the ion-enthousiasmos-phaedrus-mania candidate.