philosopherphenomenologymerleau-ponty-scholarnaturphilosophieschelling-scholarphilosophy-of-nature
Taylor Knight
Author of *Merleau-Ponty and the Essence of Nature: A Return to Elemental Symbolism* (Edinburgh University Press, New Perspectives in Ontology series, 2024; foreword by Emmanuel Falque) — the wiki's primary source for the elemental-ontology / aquatic-cosmogony reading of MP's late philosophy of nature, and for the systematic linkage of MP to Schellingian Naturphilosophie via tautegory and biosemiotics.
Why Knight Matters for the Wiki
- Elemental ontology: Knight argues that MP's late thought develops an "elemental ontology" more fundamental than the concept of being, governed by the image of primordial water. The element is a dynamic ground that creates being by negating itself — "silt precipitating from receding floodwaters." Three phenomenological accounts of the originary map onto three Greek cosmogonies: Heidegger = earth-sky (Hesiodic), Levinas = Night (Orphic), MP = primordial water (Homeric). Water is pre-horizonal — it must recede before any earth-sky horizon can gather. The wiki's primary anchor for the ecart read as a source of creative power rather than a deconstructive tool.
- Schelling-MP via tautegory: Knight reads the chiasm as developing Schelling's tautegory (saying-the-same; symbol as the finite manifestation of the infinite through self-repetition) by thinking "from the middle." The barbarian-principle (Schelling's das barbarische Prinzip) cannot be separated from the concept of symbol — nature operates symbolically through tautegory, not allegory. The chiasm radicalizes the symbol by making the relationship primary.
- Biosemiotic mediation: Knight reads Uexküll as the biosemiotic mediator of Schellingian Naturphilosophie into MP — the cross-tradition middle term. See jakob-von-uexkull §"Connections" and §"Sources".
- Anti-deconstructive corrective: Knight argues that the dominant Anglo-American reading of MP as forerunner to Derrida/Deleuze/Foucault misreads the ecart as a deconstructive tool; it is rather a source of creative power in the original togetherness of sensing and sensed.
Scholarly Profile
- Method: philosophical-genealogical reconstruction crossing MP's late thought with Schellingian Naturphilosophie, Presocratic cosmogony (Hesiod, Orphic, Homeric), and biosemiotics. Cross-tradition rather than confined to MP-internal exegesis.
- Distinctive interpretive moves: (i) the aquatic principle as pre-horizonal; (ii) ontogenesis as desiccation of being (the axolotl's swimming-to-walking transition as creation through self-negation); (iii) the syllogism "perception is the true unconscious" + "symbol is most true to perception" = "symbol is the true unconscious" — the unconscious in MP integrates Schelling (productive), Freud (repressive), Husserl (phenomenological); (iv) "It is not we who dream of nature, but nature who dreams in us" (Knight's concluding formulation).
- Wiki coverage: one book (2024).
Connections
- authored knight-2024-merleau-ponty-essence-of-nature — the wiki's only Knight source.
- reads Uexküll as the biosemiotic mediator of Schelling's Naturphilosophie into MP (cross-tradition middle term).
- reads the chiasm as developing Schelling's tautegory and the barbarian-principle as inseparable from natural-symbolism.
- contrasts with deconstructive readings of MP (Lawlor); Heidegger's horizonal ontology; Levinas's il y a as pure positivity.
- complements Gardner 2016 — both identify a deep MP-Schelling structural parallel; Gardner via Real-Idealismus and the Third Critique, Knight via tautegory, Naturphilosophie, and the elemental.
Sources
- knight-2024-merleau-ponty-essence-of-nature — Edinburgh University Press, New Perspectives in Ontology series (2024). Foreword by Emmanuel Falque (Institut Catholique de Paris).