Weave Pass 3 — Run 3 (Bridge-Card Layer Inaugural Run, Dry-Run)

Date: 2026-05-08 Mode: dry-run (default; not preceded by a session-local Pass 3 calibration PASS — bridge-card-specific calibration not yet defined per schema-changelog v0d.5) Run number: 3 of 2026-05-08 (run 1 was the Pass 1 dry-run survey at weave-survey-2026-05-08.md; run 2 was the calibrated apply-mode iso-scan at weave-pass3-run2-2026-05-08.md; this run 3 is the inaugural bridge-card production output) Skill version: weave SKILL.md v0d.5 (bridge-card sub-output added 2026-05-08) Trigger: silent-keys Phase 2 report wiki/.audit/silent-keys-2026-05-07.md produced 5 PASS candidates ("defer to Phase 8 Step 8.5 next pass") with no shared review surface for naming each candidate's mechanism, evidence, counterpressure, and apply-mode action set. v0d.5 bridge-card layer ships as the dedicated review surface.

This run produces zero wiki-content writes. All 5 cards stage at Status: proposed and require per-card maintainer sign-off (Approved by maintainer: YYYY-MM-DD line, added in-file by the maintainer) before any apply-mode follow-up branch performs writes. Apply-mode authorization for bridge-card production is itself gated on bridge-card-specific calibration, deferred to a follow-up branch.

Sub-output type breakdown:

(a) Drafted candidate-claim entries: 0 (none; this run is bridge-card-only)
(b) Drafted false-friend cautions: 0 (none; this run is bridge-card-only)
(c) Drafted bridge cards: 5 (all Status: proposed)

Pass 3 sub-output type for this run: bridge cards only. The structural-isomorphism scan (with iso-scanner calibration) is not re-run; this run consumes the silent-keys Phase 2 output rather than scanning concept-page pairs. Future Pass 3 runs may mix all three sub-output types.

Source-trace summary

All 5 cards' anchors verified PRESENT in wiki/.audit/silent-keys-2026-05-07.md before bridge-card draft. The silent-keys report is the upstream artifact that motivates each card; the cards do not introduce new evidence beyond what the silent-keys scan attested. The cards' role is to wrap the existing evidence in the 10-field template for maintainer review, name each candidate's mechanism / register / counterpressure / apply-mode action set, and stage the apply-mode follow-up.

#	Bridge	Type	Primary home	Anchors traced to silent-keys-2026-05-07.md
1	déposer / deposited sense	mechanism	`[[institution]]`	§"Source 2" tier-1 PASS row 1
2	haunting / obsessive presence	modal-temporal	`[[institution-of-the-proletariat]]`	§"Source 2" tier-1 PASS row 3
3	endurance du chaos	mechanism (attitudinal)	`[[good-ambiguity]]`	§"Source 1" tier-1 PASS row 1
4	ontologie / philosophie militante	mechanism (attitudinal)	`[[indirect-ontology]]`	§"Source 1" tier-1 PASS row 2
5	the past that could have been otherwise	modal-temporal	`[[transtemporality]]`	§"Source 2" tier-1 PASS row 2

Card 1 — déposer / "deposit a sense" / deposited

Status: proposed Bridge type: mechanism Primary home: [[institution]] Secondary homes: [[stiftung]], [[sedimentation]], [[reprise]]

Relation:

[[institution]] is the condition of intelligibility of the sense-deposit mechanism (the verb-form déposer).
[[stiftung]] enacts the same mechanism in MP's German-mediated lexicon; déposer is the French verb-form, Stiftung the noun-form of the same operation.
[[sedimentation]] contrasts with the déposer register: sediment is the residue-side of the operation, déposer is the call-side (what survives is not residue but call-to-follow).
[[reprise]] is the takable-up dimension of the déposer mechanism — what is deposited is that which can be taken up again.

Evidence anchors:

M-C 2026 León (extraction note line 3863) — déposer / deposited as institution's mechanism in León's chapter.
M-C 2026 Caraus (extraction note lines 285–286) — déposer in Caraus's PhP↔I&P convergence reading.
M-C 2026 Mendoza-Canales (extraction note line 1826) — déposer in the editor's introduction articulating Stiftung-becoming.
M-C 2026 Pagan — déposer implicitly via "deposit a sense" formulation; cross-references silent-keys-2026-05-07.md §"Source 2" tier-1 PASS row 1.
MP I&P p. 77 — "deposit a sense in me, not just as something surviving or as a residue, but as the call to follow." Source-text anchor.

Evidence status: extraction-note anchored. (Cross-author convergence in M-C 2026 confirms déposer operates as a thematic register across 4 chapters; MP's own I&P p. 77 anchors the source-text deployment.)

What it makes visible: institution's mechanism is neither pure event (subject-pole constitution) nor pure residue (object-pole sedimentation) — it is the verb-form déposer, the dynamic call that survives without surviving as residue. Without naming this verb, institution collapses into one of the two poles and the dynamic-call dimension drops out.

Counterpressure: the 4-chapter cross-author convergence (León, Caraus, Mendoza-Canales, Pagan) attests M-C 2026's editorial reading more than MP's original lexicon — déposer is MP's own word at I&P p. 77, but the centralization of déposer as institution's master mechanism across 4 chapters is the M-C 2026 editorial frame. Treating déposer as a stable mechanism term presupposes that frame. Counter-test: does déposer operate this way in PoP / Husserl-limits / Inédits I–II? If yes, the bridge survives the editorial-frame caveat; if no, the bridge belongs as an M-C 2026-internal register rather than a corpus-wide mechanism.

Apply as:

Subsection on [[institution]] (under existing What the Concept Does or new Mechanism subsection): name déposer as the verb-form distinguishing institution from constitution and sedimentation. Cite MP I&P p. 77 + M-C 2026 León / Caraus / Mendoza-Canales / Pagan attestations.
Typed connection on [[stiftung]] Connections section: *shares mechanism with* [[institution]] along the déposer / Stiftung axis (German cognate).
Typed connection on [[sedimentation]] Connections section: *contrasts with* [[institution]] along the déposer axis (sediment = residue-side; déposer = call-side).
Typed connection on [[reprise]] Connections section: *is the takable-up dimension of* [[institution]]'s déposer mechanism. (Resolves the typed-connection-upgrade item flagged in silent-keys-2026-05-07.md §"Source 2" NEAR-MISS row for taken up / reprendre.)

Approved by maintainer: (awaiting per-card sign-off — apply-mode follow-up blocked until this line carries a date)

Card 2 — haunting / "obsessive presence" / "haunts"

Status: proposed Bridge type: modal-temporal Primary home: [[institution-of-the-proletariat]] Secondary homes: [[passence]], [[depth-of-time]], [[transtemporality]]

Relation:

[[institution-of-the-proletariat]] enacts the modal-temporal register of how the proletariat persists in late MP without being present (the proletariat's "obsessive presence" / "haunting" mode).
[[passence]] is a reformulation of the haunting / hovering register in I&P's working vocabulary (cf. Schwebung / phantom / hovering in Dufourcq §§1-2).
[[depth-of-time]] enacts the same modal-temporal register in the temporal-thickness mode (Lanzirotti's flesh as "thickness" §§4-5).
[[transtemporality]] is the condition of intelligibility of the haunting register's modal-temporal status; haunting is one mode within trans-temporality's broader register.

Evidence anchors:

M-C 2026 Caraus (extraction note line 277) — PhP proletariat as "obsessive presence" cross-referenced with I&P question that "haunts."
M-C 2026 Caraus (extraction note line 293) — convergence of PhP "obsessive presence" with I&P "haunts" articulated as a thematic structural register.
M-C 2026 Dufourcq §§1-2 (extraction note pp. 192-202 cluster) — Schwebung / phantom / hovering in the late ontology.
M-C 2026 Lanzirotti §§4-5 — flesh as "thickness" (modal-temporal correlate of haunting).
MP PhP "obsessive presence" — source-text anchor for the PhP side of the convergence (Caraus's reading).
silent-keys-2026-05-07.md §"Source 2" tier-1 PASS row 3 verdict.

Evidence status: extraction-note anchored. (Cross-source convergence visible inside M-C 2026's 12-chapter spread; the PhP / I&P anchor is at MP-text level via Caraus.)

What it makes visible: the proletariat's persistence in late MP is not biographical-rhetorical (Caraus is not just noting that MP kept caring about the proletariat) but ontological-modal — a structural mode of "haunting" that cuts across the PhP "obsessive presence" / I&P "haunts" / Dufourcq Schwebung / Lanzirotti flesh-thickness register. Without naming the bridge, "the proletariat persists in late MP" reads as nostalgia or political continuity; with it, persistence becomes a structural ontological mode.

Counterpressure: cross-source convergence is secondary-author-mediated — Caraus and Dufourcq are reading PhP↔I&P convergence; MP himself does not name "haunting" as a thematic register. The bridge could be reading editorial-interpretive commitments back into MP's text. Counter-test: a raw-source check of the PhP "obsessive presence" passage's local context against the I&P "haunts" question and the V&I working notes' "phantom" / Schwebung register, to verify whether MP is using these terms in genuinely related modal-temporal registers or whether the convergence is post-hoc commentary. The bridge stays at proposed-bridge-card status until that check lands.

Apply as:

Subsection on [[institution-of-the-proletariat]] (Stakes or Open Questions): name the haunting / obsessive-presence register as the modal-temporal mode of the proletariat's persistence in late MP.
Typed connection on [[passence]] Connections section: *is a reformulation of* the haunting / hovering register in I&P's working vocabulary.
Subsection or open-question entry on [[depth-of-time]]: cross-link to the haunting register as one mode of how the past persists without being present.
Subsection or open-question entry on [[transtemporality]]: cross-link to the haunting register as the PhP prefiguration of trans-temporal modes; flag for second-source confirmation.
Possible motifs.md candidate ("hauntology-in-MP" / phantom register) — flag for the next motifs-delta sweep when a second non-M-C-2026 anchor lands. Saint Aubert 2021 Ineinander / cristallisation may already provide the second anchor; check at next audit. Recorded in silent-keys-2026-05-07.md §"Source 2" recommended action 3 as a cross-source motif candidate.

Approved by maintainer: (awaiting per-card sign-off)

Card 3 — endurance du chaos

Status: proposed Bridge type: mechanism (attitudinal) Primary home: [[good-ambiguity]] Secondary homes: [[hyper-dialectic]], [[ineinander]], [[indirect-ontology]]

Note on Primary home selection: silent-keys-2026-05-07.md §"Source 1" recommended action 1 left the anchor ambiguous between [[ineinander]], [[hyperdialectique]], and [[good-ambiguity]]. This card specifies [[good-ambiguity]] as Primary home because endurance du chaos names an attitudinal register (the posture required to hold contradictory monocular vues until binocular form emerges) — that is the affective-attitudinal correlate of good ambiguity, and good-ambiguity is the concept page where the "binocular form" reading already lives. [[ineinander]] and [[hyper-dialectic]] get reciprocal typed connections rather than primary residence.

Relation:

[[good-ambiguity]] is the condition of intelligibility of the endurance du chaos posture; the posture enacts good ambiguity at the affective-attitudinal level.
[[hyper-dialectic]] requires the endurance du chaos posture as its attitudinal precondition (one cannot practice hyper-dialectic without sustaining the unresolved contradiction).
[[ineinander]] contrasts with endurance du chaos on the structural-vs-attitudinal axis: ineinander names the structural register of the binocular form; endurance names the attitudinal correlate.
[[indirect-ontology]] enacts the endurance posture in its method (committed engagement with the partial, the unresolved).

Evidence anchors:

SA-2006 Ch IV §1 section title — endurance du chaos used as a section heading, signaling its load-bearing role in SA's reconstruction of MP's late ontology.
SA-2006 extraction-note primary-concepts list (in primary as endurance du chaos) — confirms ingest-time recognition that the term is positionally load-bearing despite frequency-low textual presence.
silent-keys-2026-05-07.md §"Source 1" tier-1 PASS row 1 verdict and work-test ("Names the attitude required for late ontology — distinct from Heideggerian Gelassenheit, distinct from Ent-schlossenheit, distinct from any pre-dialectical solution... Carnal-perceptual analogue of binocular vision: holding contradictory monocular vues together until binocular form emerges").

Evidence status: source-page anchored. (SA-2006 source page carries the section title as an organizing chapter-internal heading; the silent-keys Phase 2 work-test verified the term's positional weight.)

What it makes visible: late MP's positive response to deux positivismes requires not just a concept (binocular form, good ambiguity) but an attitude (endurance of contradiction-without-resolution). The carnal-perceptual analogue of binocular vision: holding contradictory monocular vues together until the binocular form emerges. Without naming the attitudinal correlate, late ontology reduces to mere refusal of resolution; with it, indirection becomes positive engagement.

Counterpressure: single-volume primary attestation (SA-2006 only). The endurance register may be SA's archival-philological reading rather than a stable MP-corpus register. Counter-test: does endurance du chaos surface in V&I working notes, Eye and Mind, or Signs under another vocabulary? Adjacent risk: the term may overlap with Heideggerian Gelassenheit in ways SA does not foreground; the bridge-card framing distinguishes them, but the line is contestable.

Apply as:

Subsection on [[good-ambiguity]] (under What the Concept Does or new Stakes section): name endurance du chaos as the affective-attitudinal correlate of the binocular form. Cite SA-2006 Ch IV §1.
Typed connection on [[hyper-dialectic]] Connections section: *requires* endurance du chaos as its attitudinal precondition (or *enacts* along with the existing 1955 Adventures of the Dialectic anchors).
Open-question / cross-link on [[ineinander]]: flag endurance as the affective-attitudinal correlate that ineinander's structural register does not name (resolves the silent-keys-2026-05-07.md §"Source 1" recommended-action-1 ambiguity by routing the attitudinal register away from [[ineinander]] as Primary home).
Open-question / cross-link on [[indirect-ontology]]: flag the endurance register as a candidate for future Stakes section once second-source attestation lands.

Approved by maintainer: (awaiting per-card sign-off)

Card 4 — ontologie / philosophie militante

Status: proposed Bridge type: mechanism (attitudinal) Primary home: [[indirect-ontology]] Secondary homes: [[hyper-dialectic]]

Note on Primary home selection: silent-keys-2026-05-07.md §"Source 1" recommended action 2 named two candidate anchors: [[indirect-ontology]] (under a future Stakes or What the Concept Does section) or [[hyperdialectique]] (typed-connection upgrade). This card specifies [[indirect-ontology]] as Primary home because the 1947→1958→post-1958 attestation arc tracks militante into MP's late lexicon — the ontology-side framing — while hyper-dialectic is a consequence of the militant attitude, not its primary home. [[hyper-dialectic]] gets a reciprocal typed-connection upgrade.

Relation:

[[indirect-ontology]] enacts the attitudinal mode of philosophie / ontologie militante (committed engagement with the empirical, the partial); indirect-ontology is the condition of intelligibility of a philosophie militante.
[[hyper-dialectic]] is a reformulation of the militant register as dialectical practice (1955 Adventures of the Dialectic trajectory).

Evidence anchors:

SA-2006 raw 1047 (1947) — "toute philosophie existante est militante."
SA-2006 raw 1287 — 1958 Introduction "ontologie militante."
SA-2006 raw 1678 — Être et Monde "ontologie militante."
silent-keys-2026-05-07.md §"Source 1" tier-1 PASS row 2 verdict and work-test ("Names MP's attitude required for indirect ontology — committed engagement with the empirical, the partial. Distinct from philosophie triomphante. Without it, indirect ontology reduces to negative-via-Heidegger; with it, indirection becomes positive-engagement").

Evidence status: source-page anchored. (SA-2006 source page carries the three raw-passage attestations spanning 1947–post-1958; the silent-keys Phase 2 work-test verified the maturation arc.)

What it makes visible: the 1947→1958→post-1958 attestation arc tracks the maturation of the militante register into MP's late lexicon — committed engagement distinguishes indirect ontology from negative-via-Heidegger. Without it, indirect ontology reduces to Heidegger-mediated negative theology; with it, indirection becomes positive engagement.

Counterpressure: SA-2006 archival material; the militante term is MP's own but the centralization as a stable late-MP register is SA's interpretive emphasis. Adjacent risk of confusion with philosophie militante in earlier French Marxism (Politzer, Lefebvre) — MP's deployment may not be cleanly separable from the political-philosophical register that surrounded him. Counter-test: a raw-source check of the 1947 attestation's local context to verify the philosophical-vs-political weighting of militante.

Apply as:

Subsection on [[indirect-ontology]] (under What the Concept Does or new Stakes section): name philosophie / ontologie militante as the attitudinal mode of indirect ontology. Cite SA-2006 1947 / 1958 / post-1958 arc.
Typed connection on [[hyper-dialectic]] Connections section: *is a reformulation of* the militant register as dialectical practice (or strengthen existing 1955 Adventures of the Dialectic connection).

Approved by maintainer: (awaiting per-card sign-off)

Card 5 — "the past that could have been otherwise"

Status: proposed Bridge type: modal-temporal Primary home: [[transtemporality]] Secondary homes: [[institution]], [[stiftung]]

Relation:

[[transtemporality]] enacts the modal hinge that converts epistemological-political theses (theory-points-to-the-possible) into ontological ones; "the past that could have been otherwise" is the condition of intelligibility of trans-temporality's ontological-mode reading.
[[institution]] enacts the past-that-could-have-been-otherwise mode in its dynamic-call dimension (institution leaves what was deposited open to having been otherwise; cf. Card 1's déposer).
[[stiftung]] enacts the same mode in Stiftung-becoming (the German cognate).

Evidence anchors:

M-C 2026 Larison (extraction note line 4464) — single-source attestation of "the past that could have been otherwise" as modal hinge.
M-C 2026 extraction-note tracker §"trans-temporality" (HUB) — broader trans-temporality register to which the modal hinge connects.
silent-keys-2026-05-07.md §"Source 2" tier-1 PASS row 2 verdict and work-test ("Modal hinge that converts Chauí's epistemological-political thesis (theory-points-to-the-possible) into an ontological one. Underwrites Larison's reading of trans-temporality as the condition of possibility for the theory-praxis inversion. Used once but does positional-pivotal work").

Evidence status: extraction-note anchored, single-source. (Larison single-source within M-C 2026; never named as a thesis in the volume itself.)

What it makes visible: trans-temporality becomes ontological (not just epistemological-Marxist) when read through Larison's modal hinge — the past has a mode of being that could have been otherwise, not just a mode of being-known that could have differed. Without the hinge, trans-temporality is Marxist-epistemological (theory-points-to-the-possible); with it, it is ontological (the possible-otherwise is in the past itself, not just in our reading of it).

Counterpressure: single-source attestation (Larison only); never named as a thesis in the M-C 2026 volume itself. The modal hinge is Larison's interpretive emphasis, not a stable MP-corpus register. Counter-test required before any promotion above bridge-card / subsection level: a second non-Larison anchor (preferably from MP's own I&P / V&I working notes) or a raw-source check of MP's text for this modal register.

Promotion blocker: this card carries an explicit single-source promotion blocker. Even if maintainer signs off on apply-mode bridge-card writes (the subsection and open-question additions in the Apply as: list), the bridge does NOT promote to a claims.md candidate, a motifs.md entry, or a stable concept-page section above the open-question level until a second-source or raw-check anchor lands.

Apply as:

Subsection on [[transtemporality]] (under What the Concept Does or Open Questions): name "the past that could have been otherwise" as the modal hinge that converts epistemological-political into ontological registers. Cite M-C 2026 Larison.
Open-question entry on [[institution]]: flag "the past that could have been otherwise" as candidate modal-temporal register for institution's dynamic-call dimension; cross-reference Card 1's déposer.
Open-question entry on [[stiftung]]: flag the same register as candidate for Stiftung-becoming.
Promotion deferred: if and when second-source attestation lands, candidate claims.md slug transtemporality-as-ontological-modal-hinge or past-could-have-been-otherwise-as-modal-hinge (claim type: structural-parallel or corrective, depending on whether the second source converges with Larison or complicates the modal-hinge reading). Until then, blocked at bridge-card / open-question level.

Approved by maintainer: 2026-05-12 Signed apply scope: items 1, 4 only; see bridge-card-signoff/run-1/adjudication.md#card-5 (Items 2 and 3 struck per plan v4 §11.5 because Card 1 was BLOCKED in run 1 and items 2/3 cross-reference Card 1's déposer on [[institution]] / [[stiftung]]. The single-source promotion blocker remains in force: apply-mode action set is limited to subsection + open-question writes on [[transtemporality]]; further promotion requires second-source landing first.)

Self-check

All 5 cards carry all 10 fields of the v0d.5 template. ✓
All 5 cards Status: proposed. ✓
All 5 cards' anchors verified PRESENT in silent-keys-2026-05-07.md (cross-reference table at top). ✓
All 5 cards specify Primary home unambiguously (Cards 3 and 4 explain Primary-home selection where the silent-keys report left the anchor ambiguous). ✓
All 5 cards include at least one Counterpressure entry. ✓
All 5 cards include an enumerated Apply as: list. ✓
Card 5 carries an explicit single-source promotion blocker. ✓
Each card carries an Approved by maintainer: line awaiting per-card sign-off. ✓
No claim entries promoted, no concept-page edits, no motifs.md edits — dry-run discipline preserved. ✓
Run number -run3 continues the existing -runN sequence (run 1 = survey, run 2 = iso-scan apply). ✓

Cross-references to other phases / artifacts

silent-keys-2026-05-07.md — upstream artifact; all 5 cards' anchors trace here. The "defer to Phase 8 Step 8.5 next pass" recommendations are now staged as bridge cards rather than waiting for Phase 8 to absorb them.
next-actions.md (created in this branch) — the bridge-card application queue is one row in the consolidated navigational queue; that row depends on this report.
Phase 8 Step 8.5 next pass — once any of these bridge cards is signed off and applied (in the follow-up branch), Phase 8 Step 8.5 has fewer subsection-upgrade items to absorb. The bridge-card layer reduces Phase 8's residual scope by the count of applied cards.
motifs.md hauntology-in-MP candidate — Card 2's Apply-as item 5 flags this for the next motifs-delta sweep when a second non-M-C-2026 anchor lands.

What this run does NOT do

Does not run the structural-isomorphism scanner (this run consumes silent-keys output, not concept-page pairs).
Does not re-execute Pass 3 calibration (no iso-scan to calibrate).
Does not perform any apply-mode wiki-content writes — zero writes to concept pages, claims.md, motifs.md, index.md beyond the existence of this report file.
Does not promote any bridge to claim or motif status.
Does not foreclose future iterations of these cards: maintainer review may amend, split, merge, or reject any card before sign-off.

Sign-off log — run-1 pilot (2026-05-12)

Per wiki/.audit/bridge-card-signoff/run-1/adjudication.md:

Card 1 (deposer) — BLOCKED (revise-and-resubmit eligible per §11a). DEFECT pattern: #6 (schema-vocabulary closed-list violation on apply-as items 2, 4).
Card 2 (haunting) — BLOCKED (revise-and-resubmit eligible). DEFECT patterns: Test 5 absent Note on Primary home; #5 + #6 (apply-as #2 contradicts existing [[passence]] page).
Card 3 (endurance-du-chaos) — BLOCKED (revise-and-resubmit eligible). DEFECT patterns: Test 4 missing Promotion blocker; #6 (*requires* outside schema vocabulary).
Card 4 (ontologie / philosophie-militante) — BLOCKED (revise-and-resubmit eligible). DEFECT patterns: Test 4 missing blocker; #7 + #14 + #18 (bridge-type miscoded, 1953-55 transition unaddressed, anchor underdetermination); Role C Rule-18 stale-anchor finding (NMS date 1947 → 1957).
Card 5 (past-that-could-have-been-otherwise) — SIGN-OFF-WITH-NARROWING. Approved scope: items 1, 4 only; items 2, 3 struck per §11.5 cross-card reconciliation (Card 1 BLOCKED).
Card 6 (l'épaisseur opératoire) — BLOCKED, no-fundamental. Seeded calibration card; not a real Pass 3 output.