title: "Synthetic-layer follow-up: δ-affected supported HALT discharge" type: audit-report date: 2026-05-09 phase: synthetic-layer

Synthetic-layer follow-up — 2026-05-09 — δ-affected supported HALT discharge

Run framing

  • Date: 2026-05-09
  • Audit type: Follow-up to 2026-05-05 audit synthesis (audit-synthesis-2026-05-05.md)
  • Scope: δ-affected supported-promotion HALT discharge per next-actions.md row 6 (medium priority)
  • Authority: User pre-authorization 2026-05-09 for δ-affected supported HALT queue (CLAUDE.md §Claim Status Gates supported-rule pre-authorized for this run only)
  • Prior state: Per audit-synthesis-2026-05-05.md §2 + tenth-run report, the δ-decision adjudication on 2026-05-05 produced a 9-slug HALT queue blocking supported promotion until γ-decision propagation completes. Verified at 2026-05-09 run start: γ-propagation is complete on the wiki body (8 δ-affected concept pages rewritten by 2026-05-05 eighth run; cite-back queue discharged 2026-05-05 to 2026-05-07).

δ-affected slug status verified at run start

Slug Status verified Eligibility for this run
science-secrete-stiftung-chiasm contested Not eligible (contested per γ adjudication)
kaushik-stiftung-literary-frame live Eligible (live → supported)
taddio-secret-science-as-gestalt-perception candidate Not eligible (candidate, not live)
cryptic-institution-extends-beith candidate Not eligible (candidate, not live)
ip-pop-architectural-hierarchy already supported No work (promoted 2026-05-05 ninth run)
ineinander-universalizes-institution live Eligible (live → supported)
faul-institutional-camp live Eligible (live → supported)
time-as-late-mp-privileged-ontological-clue candidate Not eligible (candidate, not live)
mp-1942-already-prefigures-late-sedimentation live Eligible (live → supported)

Eligible queue: 4 slugs (kaushik-stiftung-literary-frame, ineinander-universalizes-institution, faul-institutional-camp, mp-1942-already-prefigures-late-sedimentation).

Method

For each eligible slug, the claim-promotion-reviewer subagent's 5-test gate (per CLAUDE.md §Claim Status Gates) was applied. The reviewer's role per its agent file: "advisory; not to bless or block, but to surface anything the first pass might have missed." Verdict is recorded per slug. Adjudication rule: all 5 tests PASS or only minor concerns → promote; any HARD concern (broken evidence chain, missing counterpressure, thin payoff that doesn't survive restatement against counter-position) → leave at live, document concern.

Evidence anchors for each claim were verified inline by reading the relevant extraction-note passages (raw line references and extraction-note line references checked). Sub-output of evidence checks is not duplicated here; see the per-slug Evidence sections in claims.md itself for the verified anchors.

Per-slug review and decision

1. kaushik-stiftung-literary-frame (live → supported)

Claim-promotion-reviewer report

# Claim Promotion Review: kaushik-stiftung-literary-frame

**Current status**: live
**Proposed status**: supported

## Test 1 — Contestable formulation
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Reasoning**: The claim is a gap-identification (Kaushik's primary architectural framing of *Stiftung* and chiasm is literary-language; the painter-as-primary-witness register is not the primary frame). It is contestable — and is contested in the Counterpressure section by readings that emphasize Kaushik's painting chapters (2019 Ch 2 on Schelling's light; 2021 chs 2–4 on chiasm and visibility). The contestation surface is sharp: the claim asserts *primary architectural framing*, not topical absence; a reader who treated Kaushik as not engaging painting at all would be wrong; the right reading is that Kaushik subsumes the painter under the symbolic-matrix and literary-rhetorical apparatus.

## Test 2 — Evidence traceability
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Per-bullet check**:
  - Bullet 1: [[kaushik-2019-matrixed-ontology]] extraction-note lines 7, 60, 75 — verified. Line 7 anchors the 1954–55 institution-as-symbolic-matrices framing; line 60 anchors matrixed ontology as "ontology before formal ontology"; line 75 anchors institution / *Stiftung* as the double sense on which the symbolic matrix is built.
  - Bullet 2: [[kaushik-2021-negation-implex]] extraction-note lines 66, 117, 144 — verified. Line 66 anchors Kaushik's three additions to chiasm (matrix formed through counter- and interpositioning, borrowed from Valéry, redoubled negation); line 117 anchors indirect ontology as "lateral or even endo-ontology"; line 144 anchors Valéry as source of both "chiasm" and "implex" via the 1953 literary language lectures (*Recherches sur l'usage littéraire du langage*). The literary-language framing is verified at the philological level in Kaushik's own self-citation chain.

## Test 3 — Counterpressure recorded
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Reasoning**: Counterpressure has three layers: (i) Kaushik 2019 Ch 2 and Kaushik 2021 chs 2–4 do engage painting; (ii) the gap-identification is therefore *primary architectural framing* not topical absence; (iii) δ-pressure on the painter-side framing is recorded with γ-aligned restatement (per 2026-05-05 update). The Counterpressure articulates the rival reading without straw-manning it.

## Test 4 — Payoff beyond aggregation
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **What this claim makes visible**: The claim positions the wiki's (Paper A's) distinguishing move from Kaushik. Without it, a reader could mistake Paper A for proposing a competitor to Kaushik's matrixed ontology; with it, Paper A's painter-as-primary-witness framing reads as *coordinate* with Kaushik's literary-rhetorical framing within the indirect-ontology problem-space, not rival to it. The γ-aligned 2026-05-05 restatement preserves this work after [[claims#science-secrete-stiftung-chiasm]] was contested. This is more than "these pages are related": it specifies the *kind* of relation (coordinate registers within a problem-space) and the architectural import (Kaushik reaches indirect ontology through literary-rhetorical structure; the wiki reaches it through the painter's discipline of indirect access).

## Test 5 — Confidence under counter-position
- **Strongest counter-position**: Kaushik's painting chapters are extensive enough that the "primary-architectural-framing" gap-identification is overstating the gap — the right reading is that Kaushik *also* engages the painter-side register, and the wiki's distinguishing move is one of *emphasis*, not architectural framing.
- **Verdict**: PASS — recommend promote.
- **Reasoning**: The Counterpressure section already concedes that Kaushik does engage painting (2019 Ch 2 on Schelling's light; 2021 chs 2–4 on chiasm and visibility). The claim survives by being explicit about its scope: it is about *primary architectural framing*, not topical absence. The 2026-05-05 γ-aligned restatement narrows the architectural claim further by acknowledging that *coherent deformation* operates in literature too (per supported [[claims#coherent-deformation-universal-operative-form]]); the surviving distinction is *primacy of painting as primary-witness for indirect ontology*, not painting as anchor for a four-element architecture. This narrower claim is what survives the counter-position. Confidence `medium` is the right rating because the claim is structural-architectural (about *primacy of register*) rather than absolute (about *exclusion*).

## Summary recommendation
PROMOTE. The 5-test gate passes cleanly under the γ-aligned restatement.

Decision

PROMOTE.

Status after

Status: supported · Confidence: medium · Updated: 2026-05-09

2. ineinander-universalizes-institution (live → supported)

Claim-promotion-reviewer report

# Claim Promotion Review: ineinander-universalizes-institution

**Current status**: live
**Proposed status**: supported

## Test 1 — Contestable formulation
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Reasoning**: The claim has a clear structure-and-corollary: (i) the trajectory from 1954–55 *Institution and Passivity* to PoP App-A2 shows *Ineinander* generalizes institutional structure into a principle coextensive with Being; (ii) the symbolic matrix is a corollary instance of *Ineinander* in the restricted domain of temporal-historical sense-genesis. The structure-and-corollary is contestable, and Counterpressure articulates two specific rival readings (Saint Aubert's *surrection* reading; Kaushik's matrix-primacy reading).

## Test 2 — Evidence traceability
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Per-bullet check**:
  - Bullet 1: [[merleau-ponty-2022-possibility-of-philosophy]] extraction-note line 156 (raw 1965, App-A2) — verified. The cardinal late-MP formulation "Philosophy is, as method, knowledge of the *Ineinander*" is anchored verbatim, with the App-A8 (line 168, raw 2078) extension to the organism. Raw line 2085's *Weltallgemeinigkeit* / *Weltlichkeit* extension to all of life is verified.
  - Bullet 2: [[merleau-ponty-2010-institution-and-passivity]] extraction-note lines 88, 133, 143 — verified. Line 88 anchors symbolic matrix as "a proto-version of *ineinander* in a more psychologically-inflected vocabulary." Line 133 anchors "the symbolic matrix and cohesion-of-a-life concepts are early versions of what becomes ineinander in the late ontology." Line 143 anchors the genealogical claim that "the *conceptual work* of institution is folded into *écart*, *ineinander*, *chiasm* in the later ontology. Institution is not abandoned, it is translated into an ontological vocabulary."
  - Bullet 3: [[merleau-ponty-1968-visible-and-invisible]] extraction-note lines 300, 334, 584 — verified. Line 334 anchors *Ineinander* as "Mutual inherence... the structure by which the visible and the invisible, the past and the present, my body and the world, mutually contain one another." Line 584 (argument 47) anchors the unconscious as "the *Urgemeinschaft* of our intentional life, the *Ineinander* of the others in us and of us in them." Line 300 (Nov 1960 working note, raw 2887) anchors the *Ineinander* + *Stiftung* co-deployment grammar.
  - Bullet 4: [[kaushik-2019-matrixed-ontology]] extraction-note line 75 — verified. Anchors the genealogical link from institution → symbolic matrix.

## Test 3 — Counterpressure recorded
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Reasoning**: Counterpressure articulates two rival readings: (i) Saint Aubert's *surrection* reading, on which the late MP develops *surrection* as the operative concept that supplants both *Stiftung* and *Ineinander*; (ii) Kaushik's matrix-primacy reading, on which symbolic matrix is the primary ontological structure rather than a restricted-domain corollary of a more universal *Ineinander*. Both are non-trivial rival framings; the claim acknowledges them rather than synthesizing prematurely.

## Test 4 — Payoff beyond aggregation
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **What this claim makes visible**: The claim names a specific architectural relation between the 1954–55 institution lectures and the late ontology that *neither* the dominant abandonment-reading *nor* the chiasm-absorption-reading captures: institution is not abandoned, not absorbed into chiasm, but *universalized* into a principle coextensive with Being. The corollary specifies symbolic matrix's scope (powerful-but-bounded instance, not architectonic centre) and lets [[ineinander]] hold the architectonic role across the corpus. This is not "these pages are related"; it is a substantive architectural claim about a specific genealogical relation that re-organizes how the wiki cross-references late MP.

## Test 5 — Confidence under counter-position
- **Strongest counter-position**: Saint Aubert's *surrection* reading — if late MP develops *surrection* as the operative concept that supplants *Stiftung* AND *Ineinander* together, the universalization claim mis-identifies the destination of the trajectory (the destination is *surrection*, not *Ineinander*).
- **Verdict**: PASS — recommend promote.
- **Reasoning**: The Counterpressure section already articulates this rival reading and acknowledges it can stand alongside the universalization claim. The universalization claim does not require defeating *surrection*; it specifies what the wiki's cross-page relation is *when *Ineinander* is operative* — which it demonstrably is at PoP App-A2 (the cardinal late-MP formulation, raw line 1965). Saint Aubert's *surrection* reading is a parallel architectural proposal that the wiki acknowledges without endorsing; it does not defeat the evidence base for the *Ineinander* universalization. Confidence `medium` is the right rating because the rival readings remain live without defeating the claim.

## Summary recommendation
PROMOTE. The 5-test gate passes; the rival readings in Counterpressure are acknowledged but do not defeat the claim's evidence base.

Decision

PROMOTE.

Status after

Status: supported · Confidence: medium · Updated: 2026-05-09

3. faul-institutional-camp (live → supported)

Claim-promotion-reviewer report

# Claim Promotion Review: faul-institutional-camp

**Current status**: live
**Proposed status**: supported

## Test 1 — Contestable formulation
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Reasoning**: The claim is a corrective classification (Faul's *Ontologically Interactive Painting* places Faul in the institutional camp alongside Kaushik, not in an ethical/existential camp). It is contestable against possible ethical/existential readings of Faul; the claim makes the contestation surface explicit by naming the alternative camp the corrective rules out.

## Test 2 — Evidence traceability
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Per-bullet check**:
  - Bullets 1–3: Faul §2 / §3 / §4 anchored in Faul 2024 extraction-note Pass 2a arguments 2–9 — verified. The argumentative spine across Parts 1–3 is institution; Faul cites Inst. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 41, 77, 77–78. Susan Rothenberg's *Three Heads* is the case study; the metaphysical upshot ([[interactive-ontology]]) is derived from institution-logic, not from an ethical/existential register.
  - Bullet 4: Kaushik 2019 / 2021 institutional-camp comparison — verified per [[claims#kaushik-stiftung-literary-frame]]. Internal differentiation: Kaushik privileges 1953 literary-language register; Faul privileges 1961 *Eye and Mind* painter-world register. Both are institutional readings.
  - Bullet 5: γ-split cross-reference framing (2026-05-05) — verified. The institutional-camp classification is independent of the H_synth architectural decision.

## Test 3 — Counterpressure recorded
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Reasoning**: Counterpressure articulates four genuine concerns: (i) Faul's institution is *narrower* than Kaushik's and the wiki's broader treatment (no *Stiftung*, no Bergson, no political-Marxist register); (ii) the 2024 Faul paper is the wiki's first ingest of Faul, so the classification is robust *for that paper* but might require qualification across his corpus; (iii) the fabricated-Faul-citation incident is recorded with provenance; (iv) the Paper A *cryptic*-mode distinction depends on a separate specification.

## Test 4 — Payoff beyond aggregation
- **Verdict**: CONCERNS
- **What this claim makes visible**: The corrective classification places Paper A's distinguishing move in the right intellectual neighborhood (institutional, with internal differentiation among Kaushik / Faul / Beith / Saint Aubert). This is real payoff at the `live` grade. However, the payoff is **scope-bound to a single Faul publication**: the wiki has ingested only *Ontologically Interactive Painting*, and the Counterpressure section explicitly flags this. The classification claim says "Faul belongs in the institutional camp," but the evidence base supports only "Faul's *Ontologically Interactive Painting* is institutional." For supported-grade payoff, this scope-binding needs to be discharged either by (a) ingesting a second Faul publication that confirms institutional-camp framing across his corpus, or (b) sustained engagement with a candidate ethical/existential reading of Faul demonstrating the institutional classification survives that counter-position. Neither has been performed; γ-decision propagation does not address this binding. The original 2026-04-28 promotion-to-`live` Status History entry already specified that this binding precludes supported-grade promotion: "not `supported` because the single-publication scope of the wiki's Faul coverage and the not-yet-engaged ethical/existential rival reading both bind criterion 4 of the supported gate." That binding is unchanged.

## Test 5 — Confidence under counter-position
- **Strongest counter-position**: Some of Faul's other publications (which the wiki has not seen) engage an ethical/existential register, in which case the classification "Faul is institutional" should be qualified to "Faul's *Ontologically Interactive Painting* is institutional."
- **Verdict**: CONCERNS — recommend hold at `live`.
- **Reasoning**: The Counterpressure section concedes that the classification is robust *for that paper* but might require qualification across his corpus. Without a second Faul-publication ingest, confidence `medium` is the right rating, but the supported-grade test 5 requires that the classification *as stated* survives restatement against the strongest counter-position. The classification as stated is "Faul belongs in the institutional camp"; the strongest counter-position would qualify it to "Faul's 2024 paper is institutional" pending broader survey. The claim's confidence rating survives only if the qualified form is used; the broader form does not survive at supported-grade.

## Summary recommendation
HOLD at `live`. The 5-test gate fails on Test 4 (payoff scope-bound to single publication) and Test 5 (confidence does not survive restatement against the broader-Faul-corpus counter-position) without a second Faul ingest. γ-decision propagation does not discharge this binding.

Decision

HOLD at live. Failed Test 4 (payoff scope-bound to single Faul publication) and Test 5 (confidence does not survive restatement against broader-Faul-corpus counter-position). γ-decision propagation does not discharge the single-publication-scope binding that the original 2026-04-28 Status History entry already specified.

Status after

Status: live (unchanged) · Confidence: medium (unchanged) · Updated: 2026-05-05 (unchanged) · Counterpressure section appended with one-line note recording the failed test and pointing to this audit report.

4. mp-1942-already-prefigures-late-sedimentation (live → supported)

Claim-promotion-reviewer report

# Claim Promotion Review: mp-1942-already-prefigures-late-sedimentation

**Current status**: live
**Proposed status**: supported

## Test 1 — Contestable formulation
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Reasoning**: The claim is a genealogical claim with a sharp empirical anchor: SB Ch IV note 50 (raw 2653) is the earliest documented MP attestation of the sedimentation / original-vs-secondary-passivity framework. It is contestable — and is contested by the *footnote-vs-doctrine* objection in Counterpressure, which argues that a footnote-deferral is not the same as a "prefiguration of the late ontology."

## Test 2 — Evidence traceability
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Per-bullet check**:
  - Bullet 1: [[merleau-ponty-1942-structure-of-behavior]] Ch IV note 50, raw 2653 — verified verbatim in synthesis-agent raw-source spot-check. The note explicitly cites Husserl's *Formale und transzendentale Logik* (1929) p. 287 and names "natural body" / "cultural body" / "original passivity" / "secondary passivity" as the operative distinctions awaiting investigation.
  - Bullet 2: `.extraction-mp-1942-sob-CHUNK-SYNTHESIS.md` Part D.1 — verified. The synthesis agent's verification record is in the extraction note at line 206 ("Raw 2653: confirmed Ch IV note 50 verbatim").
  - Bullet 3: Cross-source `wiki/motifs.md` sedimentation HUB pre-correction state — verified. The HUB previously listed Chouraqui 2014, MP 1945 PhP, MP 2010 I&P, MP 2002 Husserl-limits, Beith 2018, Chouraqui 2025 — but *not* SB 1942. The under-attribution by three years was corrected at this ingest.
  - Bullet 4: Structural consonance with the broader claim cluster — verified. The 1942 prefiguration is δ-compatible: sedimentation / *Stiftung* remains central in δ's three-tier expressive cluster.

## Test 3 — Counterpressure recorded
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **Reasoning**: Counterpressure articulates the *footnote-vs-doctrine* objection sharply: (i) the note is a *deferred research program*, not a worked-out doctrine; MP himself flags it as "a place for investigating more thoroughly"; (ii) Husserl himself posed the natural-body / cultural-body distinction in the cited passage, so the 1942 attestation is MP citing-Husserl rather than MP-developing-his-own-framework; (iii) the artifact-conservatism rule (CLAUDE.md General Rule 18) cuts both ways — the older note is *adequate* for what it is, and a new claim turning it into evidence for a synthetic thesis must be careful that the note is doing the work attributed to it.

## Test 4 — Payoff beyond aggregation
- **Verdict**: PASS
- **What this claim makes visible**: The claim re-bases the genealogy of MP's relation to Husserl's late philosophy by three years (PoP 1945 → SB 1942) and by twelve years vs the standard reception (which dates the framework to the 1954–55 *Institution and Passivity* courses). This is concretely consequential: it shifts the corpus sedimentation HUB origin point, shows that MP's Husserl reading begins no later than 1942, and makes visible the three-year *gap of deferral* between SB and PoP as a maturation of the same problem rather than a fresh start. Specifically, *MP's late-Husserl reading begins no later than 1942* — a long-standing open question the wiki had been flagging is closed by the documentary evidence.

## Test 5 — Confidence under counter-position
- **Strongest counter-position**: A footnote-deferral that names a problem MP "would investigate more thoroughly" but does *not* actually develop in 1942 is not the same as a "prefiguration of the late ontology"; crediting it as prefiguration risks retrospective philological projection. What MP actually does in note 50 is *acknowledge* a Husserlian problem awaits treatment — not *develop* his own framework. To be a *genuine* prefiguration (rather than a footnote-citation of a Husserlian problematic), MP would need to do *more* than register Husserl's problem. The Status History 2026-05-05 entry already specified what would be required to discharge this objection at supported-grade: "sustained engagement with the late-MP corpus to demonstrate that note 50's specific Husserl-citation (not just sedimentation generally) is what late-MP actually deepens."
- **Verdict**: CONCERNS — recommend hold at `live`.
- **Reasoning**: The Status History 2026-05-05 entry's own statement of what test 5 would require is the right characterization of what is missing: the claim would need sustained late-MP-corpus engagement (PoP "the acquired" treatment, I&P institution / passivity, V&I flesh-as-element-with-temporal-thickness) to demonstrate that the *specific* Husserl-citation in note 50 (not just sedimentation generally) is what late-MP actually deepens. That sustained engagement has not been performed since 2026-05-05; γ-decision propagation does not address it. Confidence `medium` survives at `live`-grade because the documentary evidence is unambiguous, but the *prefiguration* characterization (which is what test 5 stresses) does not survive restatement against the *footnote-vs-doctrine* counter-position without that further work.

## Summary recommendation
HOLD at `live`. The 5-test gate fails on Test 5 (confidence does not survive restatement against the *footnote-vs-doctrine* counter-position) without sustained late-MP-corpus engagement. γ-decision propagation does not discharge this binding; the Status History 2026-05-05 entry itself specifies the work required. Tests 1–4 pass.

Decision

HOLD at live. Failed Test 5 (confidence does not survive restatement against the footnote-vs-doctrine counter-position) without sustained late-MP-corpus engagement that the Status History 2026-05-05 entry itself specifies as the supported-grade requirement.

Status after

Status: live (unchanged) · Confidence: medium (unchanged) · Updated: 2026-05-05 (unchanged) · Counterpressure section appended with one-line note recording the failed test and pointing to this audit report.

Run completion summary

Eligible queue evaluated: 4 slugs.

Promoted to supported: 2 slugs.

  • kaushik-stiftung-literary-frame (live → supported, confidence medium)
  • ineinander-universalizes-institution (live → supported, confidence medium)

Held at live: 2 slugs (each with one-line Counterpressure note recording the failed test and pointing to this report).

  • faul-institutional-camp — Test 4 payoff scope-bound to single Faul publication; Test 5 confidence does not survive restatement against broader-Faul-corpus counter-position. γ-decision propagation does not discharge the binding the original 2026-04-28 Status History entry already specified.
  • mp-1942-already-prefigures-late-sedimentation — Test 5 confidence does not survive restatement against the footnote-vs-doctrine counter-position without sustained late-MP-corpus engagement that the Status History 2026-05-05 entry itself specifies.

Claim-state delta:

Metric Before (run start) After (run end) Delta
Total entries 113 113 0
supported 11 13 +2
live 54 52 −2
candidate 47 47 0
contested 1 1 0
retired 0 0 0

δ-affected supported-HALT queue residual: 2 of 9 slugs remain at live blocked by non-γ concerns (single-publication scope on Faul; sustained late-MP-corpus engagement on SB-1942-prefiguration). Both are recorded above with the specific work required to discharge them at a future audit cycle. The remaining 5 of 9 δ-affected slugs are not in scope for supported promotion this run: 1 is contested (science-secrete-stiftung-chiasm), 3 are candidate (taddio-secret-science-as-gestalt-perception, cryptic-institution-extends-beith, time-as-late-mp-privileged-ontological-clue), and 1 was already promoted (ip-pop-architectural-hierarchy 2026-05-05 ninth run).

Files modified by this run:

  • wiki/claims.md — Summary table updated for 2 promoted slugs (Status cells, Updated cells); Status / Updated frontmatter fields updated on 2 promoted entries; Status History bullets appended for 2 promoted entries; Counterpressure section appended with one-line HOLD notes for 2 held entries.

Files NOT modified by this run (per parent agent's instruction):

  • wiki/index.md — parent will update Claims summary section and Claim entries count line.
  • wiki/log.md — parent will append the run entry.
  • All concept pages — other agents are touching them in parallel.

Pre-authorization invocation: This run executed under user pre-authorization 2026-05-09 for the δ-affected supported HALT queue specifically. The pre-authorization was scoped to this run only; CLAUDE.md §Claim Status Gates supported-rule remains canonical for future supported promotions outside any pre-authorization.

Cross-references:

  • wiki/.audit/audit-synthesis-2026-05-05.md §2 — δ-affected supported HALT origin
  • wiki/.audit/next-actions.md row 6 — queue-level discharge target
  • AUDIT_PLAN.md v1.5 PF6 + thesis-architecture decision γ — durable basis for the HALT
  • CLAUDE.md §Claims Register Format → Claim Status Gates — durable 5-test gate definition