Gamma-Split Verification (2026-05-21)
Verifies that the 2026-05-05 gamma decision (science-secrete-stiftung-chiasm CONTESTED; successor mp-painter-as-primary-witness-for-indirect-ontology created) propagated correctly.
F.1 -- claims.md body scan
Scanned all references to science-secrete-stiftung-chiasm in wiki/claims.md.
- Summary table (line 161): shows
contested-- CORRECT. - Entry header (lines 197-207):
Status: contested-- CORRECT. - 6 stale "live" references found and fixed:
- Line 544 (nov-1960-stiftung-grammatical-subject Counterpressure):
live claim->contested claim - Line 586 (cryptic-institution-extends-beith Evidence, Faul cross-ref):
(live)->(contested, 2026-05-05) - Line 762 (coherent-deformation-universal-operative-form Counterpressure):
(live, medium)->(contested, medium) - Line 1786 (taddio-science-secrete-gestalt Claim text):
live->contested, 2026-05-05 - Line 1796 (taddio-science-secrete-gestalt Counterpressure):
(live)->(contested, 2026-05-05) - Line 3448 (mp-political-ontological-continuity Payoff):
(live)->(contested, 2026-05-05)
- Line 544 (nov-1960-stiftung-grammatical-subject Counterpressure):
All other cross-references in claims.md (lines 278, 294, 373, 388, 419, 429, 454, 472, 510, 515, 555, 671, 689, 771, 776, 1205, 1210, 1285, 1518, 1645, 3070, 3080, 3085, 3744, 3757, 3758) already said "contested" or referenced the claim without an explicit status label. No further fixes needed.
F.2 -- Concept page scan
Scanned all 9 delta-affected pages plus broader concept directory.
Delta-affected pages (all correct -- no stale references):
- science-secrete.md: 4 references, all say "contested" (lines 98, 144, 160, 179)
- coherent-deformation.md: 2 references, all say "contested" (lines 75, 199)
- chiasm.md: 3 references, all say "contested" (lines 149, 244, 262)
- stiftung.md: 2 references, all say "contested" (lines 104, 168)
- indirect-ontology.md: 3 references, all say "contested" (lines 129, 176, 214)
- fundamental-thought-in-art.md: 3 references, all say "contested" (lines 92, 161, 192)
- institution.md: 1 reference, says "contested" (line 246)
- ineinander.md: 2 references, all say "contested" (lines 66, 85)
Non-delta concept page:
- circulus-vitiosus-deus.md: 1 reference, says "now
contestedsince 2026-05-05" (line 253) -- CORRECT
Stale concept-page references found: 0
F.3 -- Paper A delta-path artifact cross-check
Read wiki/.audit/paper-a-delta-path-2026-05-18.md (218 lines).
- Line 3: references
claims#science-secrete-stiftung-chiasmwithStatus History 2026-05-17-- correct framing - Line 44:
science-secrete-stiftung-chiasm (contested, medium, 2026-05-17)-- CORRECT - Line 86:
promoted to live and then contested (2026-05-05)-- CORRECT historical narrative - Lines 102-113: Section 4 ("Rendering as historical contested background") -- correctly frames the claim as contested throughout
- Line 210:
science-secrete-stiftung-chiasm remains contested, medium-- CORRECT
The artifact consistently references the claim at its current contested status. No stale "live" framings.
Verdict
| Sub-task | Scanned | Stale found | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| F.1 claims.md | 38 reference lines | 6 | 6 |
| F.2 concept pages | 10 pages, 21 references | 0 | 0 |
| F.3 delta-path artifact | 1 artifact, 5 key references | 0 | n/a (read-only) |
The 9 delta-affected concept pages were correctly rewritten on 2026-05-05. The stale references were all in wiki/claims.md body text -- specifically in claim entries that cross-reference science-secrete-stiftung-chiasm but were written or last updated before the gamma decision propagated to their specific prose. All 6 have been corrected.
Status: CLEAN after fixes.